[Biblemat] B> Gospel Observer 11/11/07

tedwards at onemain.com tedwards at onemain.com
Fri Nov 23 14:02:28 CST 2007


____________________________________________________

                 THE GOSPEL OBSERVER
____________________________________________________

"Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations...teaching
them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you
always, even to the end of the age" (Matthew 28:19,20).
____________________________________________________

                  November 11, 2007
____________________________________________________

Contents:

    1) Have Ye Not Read? (Hoyt H. Houchen)
    2) Theistic Evolution -- Denial of the Record (Jim R. Everett)
    3) Why We Sing and Do Not Play (Robert F. Turner)
____________________________________________________

                          -1-

                   Have Ye Not Read?
                   by Hoyt H. Houchen

    Question: Please explain Isaiah 45:7 where God says, "I create 
evil." Does not only good come from God?

    Reply: We read in Isaiah 45:7: "I form the light, and create 
darkness; I make peace, and create evil; I am Jehovah, that doeth 
all these things." This verse raises the question: did God actually 
create only good?

    God's original creation was very good (Gen. 1:31). Also, we are 
told that God "cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempteth 
no man" (Jas. 1:13). Since God is moral (sinless), moral evil is 
contrary to His very nature. God, then, does not create moral evil.

    In what sense does God create evil? The NASB translates Isaiah 
45:7: "The one forming light and creating darkness, causing 
well-being and creating calamity; I am the Lord who does all this." 
The word rendered by the NASB, "calamity," is the Hebrew word rah, 
which basically means "evil" (either moral or misfortune evil). God 
is addressing Cyrus (v. 1), the Medo-Persian king who was later to 
"subdue kingdoms." Specifically, he would capture Babylon because 
of the wickedness that prevailed in that city. God was using Cyrus 
as His instrument to inflict this punishment. The prophecy was 
uttered more than a hundred years before Cyrus was born, but it was 
all literally fulfilled. So, in view of the meaning of the Hebrew 
word in the verse, and the context of the verse, the word "evil" 
which God creates refers to the calamities as punishment upon 
wicked nations. God, therefore, does not create moral evil, but 
calamities or misfortunes come upon man as a result of his sin (see 
Ezek. 18:20; Rom. 5:12; 6:23; Jas. 1:14,15).

    There are instances in the Old Testament when God brought 
calamity upon people as a result of their moral evil or wickedness. 
Because of wickedness, God destroyed the earth with water, sparing 
only Noah and his family (Gen. 6:5-8). God afflicted the Egyptians 
with ten plagues because of the hardness of Pharaoh's heart (Ex. 
7-12). God smote the Philistines with a great discomfiture and 
tumors while the ark of the covenant was among them (1 Sam. 5:9). 
Hell is created by God for those who are disobedient to His will 
(Matt. 25:41; 2 Thess. 1:7-9; Rev. 21:8; etc.) These are examples 
of evil which God created -- calamity, adversity, misfortune -- all 
punishment as a result of moral evil. He did not create the moral 
evil. God created man a free moral agent. When man violates God's 
moral law, it is man, not God who is responsible for moral evil.

    In 1 Samuel 16:14, we are told, "Now the Spirit of Jehovah 
departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from Jehovah troubled him." 
This verse has posed a problem for some in that they assume that 
this is a cause of moral evil coming directly from God. But 
actually, Saul's sin broke fellowship with God, and God allowed the 
evil spirit to trouble him. Again, this serves as an example of the 
evil consequences that come upon those guilty of sin or moral evil. 
The same truth is illustrated again in Saul's case (1 Sam. 18:10). 
God is the author of moral law and He is also the author of 
consequences which follow because of the violation of that law (1 
Jn. 3:4).

    Not all physical disasters today such as floods, tornadoes and 
earthquakes are due to sin (Lk. 13:1-5). Christians suffer in such 
calamities along with the wicked. Neither is it to be supposed that 
all suffering or affliction is the result of sin (see Jn. 9:2). In 
fact, Christians may suffer affliction as a means of chastisement 
(Heb. 12:7-9). Persecution is an example (2 Tim. 3:12). 
Chastisement of Christians should motivate them to greater faith. 
We all suffer misfortunes in life -- illness, disappointments, loss 
of loved ones and many more, but the Christian looks forward to 
heaven where none of these exist. Men do often blame God for 
consequences which result from their moral evil.

    A simple solution is not always found for the problem of evil 
in the world, but we do know that God does not create moral evil 
and we can always be assured that whatever God does is right and in 
harmony with His moral character (Gen. 18:25).

    -- Via Guardian of Truth XXXI: 4, p. 101, February 19, 1987
____________________________________________________

                          -2-

                 Theistic Evolution -- 
                 Denial Of The Record

                   by Jim R. Everett

    Atheistic evolution is an unscientific hypothesis because it 
affirms that life came from nothing. Theistic evolution is an 
unwarranted compromise and a denial of the record of creation 
(Genesis 1-2). No man can believe the Bible to be God's absolute 
truth while accepting evolution as man's explanation of how God 
created. The difference between "atheistic evolution" and "theistic 
evolution" is the acceptance by theists that God gave the first 
spark of life -- from that point on, the theories are basically the 
same.

    Certainly, there can be no objection to men studying "how" God 
created man as long as he recognizes a difference between 
"creation" and "evolution."  The first two chapters of Genesis do 
not give a detailed discourse on "how" God created. However, 
theories that deny the simple record of Genesis cannot be accepted. 
I believe that the modern-day theory called "theistic evolution" 
denies some very simple, fundamental facts; therefore, it must be 
rejected.

    For instance, God said, "Let us make man in our image, after 
our likeness," and then the record states, "God created man in his 
own image, in the image of God created he him, male and female 
created he them" (Genesis 1:26a, 27). How is man made in the 
likeness of God? It is not the body likeness, because God has no 
physical body (John 4:23-24). And, it cannot be mere physical life, 
for animals and trees have life. It must be spirit likeness, 
because God is spirit. How could man have been "made in God's 
image," if he simply evolved from lower animals? At what point in 
the so-called "evolutionary" process did man not posses the image 
of God and then evolve into God's likeness? Theistic evolutionists 
have to affirm that there is no difference between lower animals 
and man. This denies the record of creation.

    The theistic evolutionist, while claiming to believe in God and 
evolution at the same time, finds himself beset by many problems. 
If he truly believes in God, he must accept the word of God as 
being true. But the account in Genesis 1:26-27, contradicts the 
theory of evolution. What are his choices? He must fault the 
Genesis record of creation or he must deny the essential claims of 
evolution. If he denies the Genesis record, he cannot be a true 
believer in God and His authority. If he denies the "evolving" 
atheistic evolution postulates, he cannot be an evolutionist.

    Atheistic evolution denies the existence of God -- theistic 
evolution denies the authority and power of God. There is no 
difference in the consequences of the two!
    
    --  Via Bulletin from the Cedar Park church of Christ
____________________________________________________

                          -3-

                      Why We Sing 
                    and Do Not Play

                  by Robert F. Turner

    True Christians are committed to the principle that Christ is 
their king, and that their worship and service to Him must be 
authorized in His word. They believe they have no right to "speak 
where He has not spoken" (GOD'S WORK IN GOD'S WAY); hence, seek to 
answer religious questions by citing divine will.

    We are not under the Old Testament (2 Cor. 3:11-18) nor is our 
worship determined by figurative descriptions of heaven (Rev. 
14:2); so David's harp and heavenly "voices" have no bearing upon 
our subject. We are concerned with New Testament authority for 
music in worship, and here present all passages that deal with this 
subject. Perhaps you can decide why we sing and do not play.

    Matt. 26:30, "when they had sung a hymn"

    Mark 14:26, "when they had sung a hymn"

    Acts 16:25, "prayed, and sang praises unto God"

    Rom. 15:9, "confess to thee...and sing unto thy name"

    1 Cor. 14:15, "Sing with the spirit, and...understanding"

    Eph. 5:19, "Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns, and 
spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the 
Lord."

    Col. 3:16, "teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and 
hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the 
Lord."

    Heb. 2:12, "in the midst of the church will I sing"

    Jas. 5:13, "Is any merry? let him sing psalms"

    To avoid the force of these passages some appeal to PSALLO, the 
Greek word translated "sing" ("making melody" Eph. 5:19) because in 
earlier Greek it meant to "pluck, twang, as the strings of a harp, 
or carpenter's chalk line." But its N.T. meaning was "sing" as the 
translators testify. Further, if it does mean "play a harp," ALL 
worshipers would have to do so in order to obey these commands. No 
"psalloing" would be acceptable without the instrument.

    Appeals to popularity, love of the arts, church traditions, 
etc., fall far short of providing divine authority for instrumental 
music in the worship. Secular history points to 666 A.D. as the 
date for the first use of mechanical music in worship by church 
authority -- and that is far from God's way.

    Our plea, with reference to mechanical music in worship, is 
exactly like that for congregational independence and recognition 
of the work of the church. We believe divine authority is 
established by precept, approved example, and necessary inference. 
The only safe course is within these bounds.

                        -- Via Plain Talk, August 1964
____________________________________________________

          MYRTLE STREET CHURCH OF CHRIST
                 1022 Myrtle Street
              Denham Springs, LA  70726
                   (225) 664-8208
         Sunday: 9:15 AM, 10:00 AM, 4:00 PM
                 Wednesday: 7:00 PM
    evangelist/editor: Tom Edwards (225) 667-4520
            e-mail: tedwards at onemain.com      
    web site: http://home.onemain.com/~tedwards/go
____________________________________________________



More information about the Biblemat mailing list